The Abstract
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhSfVh6x3rAv3p8bZDAJEhCLgxrEC9mMo4B9hTbLzw8z2j0Ae-mOVphFwIvEGTIuDEU2tTTLUYndy2LwDbYse0_Jf3XI7_yXeDSkNiC8u-9ftF0dUDmgbg1O6ar4SO4xYBAhts79W0pAaQ/s400/Rembrandt_Harmensz._van_Rijn_033.jpg)
The abstract of my Masters' thesis. From the time of the Early Church until today, interpreters have employed a variety of hermeneutical methodologies to produce a range of different conclusions about the meaning of the so-called “Good Samaritan” passage of Luke 10:25–37. Nonetheless, when defending conclusions that differed from those of their contemporaries, every sincere and committed NT interpreter still referred to the same texts of Scripture as their contemporaries – a text which they all accepted as authoritative in their day. The present thesis is one such defence. The accepted text of its day is the twenty-eighth edition of the Nestle-Aland critical Greek text. The idiosyncratic interpretation it defends is called the “Grateful Victim Viewpoint” (GVV). "The Good Samaritan" by Rembrandt (1630) public domain